https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AtX8_cwXBm8
FK – if they ‘regulate’ big tech i.e. the social sites et al it’ll be to make sure the faker/milquetoast ‘conservatives’ and cowardly libertarians have a voice. The rest of us will be left out in the cold. They seek to mainstream the net and sweep all true dissent off into some dark corner the average dumbass will fear to go or likely not even know exists.
The republicrats have proven time and again they can’t be trusted to do what really needs to be done. If they were doing what they should the troops would be here fighting for our Liberty arresting and/or killing the garbage that feeds the propaganda into young minds to create voters and protesters for the fake ‘left,’ i.e. communist corporate globalists.
The ‘white paper’ sounds like the crap they’re already doing. I’ve been booted off fakebook two or three times because they accuse me of being a bot or whatever when all I’m doing is sharing links, something the net was about since the beginning when it was mostly patriots and before the corporations figured out it was their next cash cow.
WE CAN’T TRUST ANY OF THEM!!!!!!!!!
Why does the ‘Free Beacon’ article link to a commie site? …that calls our republic a democracy and links to several other commie sites? Oh, Warner is demonscat party. That explains this and how even more useless it will be.
They’ll fix the net like one fixes a stray dog, fix it and put it on a short leash, where they prefer all of us to be.
Do you think we can trust them to make the net safe for Liberty again? If you do I’ve got an anti-gravity craft I’ll sell you.
As I wrote above, it’s not that diff. from what they’re already doing:
Much of the paper focuses on increasing large firms’ transparency, making it easier for users and the general public to know what information is being collected for what purposes. A “public interest data access bill” would mandate that large platforms provide anonymized activity data to third-party researchers, allowing them to see usage trends and identify potentially concerning currents. And first party consent rules would require users’ “explicit and informed consent” before sites could sell their information.
If someone tells me they blindly trust any source I know I’m dealing with a political child.
If the troops were fighting for our freedom they’d all be here.
Don’t understand my bad attitude? Start here.
What does ‘We the People’ actually mean?
It means we are responsible…
We have a representative republic, guaranteed to every state, not a democracy.
We have a Bill of Rights that acknowledges rights we are born with, not granted or created by any government.
We vote with the knowledge that voting is the most violent act anyone can participate in because voting is electing someone to hire someone to stick a government gun in our neighbors’ faces and force our version of reality on them at the threat of their very lives.
We stand ready to protect our Liberty and the Liberty of our neighbors, not destroy it, via any version of authoritarianism, of any age or place.
We are prepared with knowledge and force of arms to make war against and kill if necessary those who would destroy our Bill of Rights whether they represent domestic or foreign enemies.
We do not lie to ourselves, our families, our friends, our business associates, our descendants, our enemies, about these things and do not EVER tolerate those who would have us do so.
If the troops were fighting for our freedom they’d all be here.
