FK – “Government is not reason, it is not eloquence, it is force.” – attributed to Gen. George Washington.
The govt. is whomever is willing to exercise the force necessary to create/maintain it.
This is no longer a nation of men so those who wrote and voted for the anti-patriot act and those who enforce the gun laws and drug war and war on terror and on and on will not soon get the justice they deserve.
I fear we are already defeated.
We are serfs and our system of govt. is feudal
John Mark King(Originally posted on fakebook)
The meme is truer than you know. In 1998, I was asked to do a report on the U.S. Constitution (1788) , comparing it with the Constitution of the Confederate States of America (1861) and the ORIGINAL constitution of the United States called the Articles of Confederation (1777). As some of you may know, NOT everyone was thrilled with the new compact composed and proposed by the 39 TRAITORS who met in Philadelphia in the summer of 1787.
The proponents of the new CONstitution CALLED THEMSELVES “The Federalists” even though what they offered in these seven Articles was FAR from a truly federal system. Their opposition, for want of better terminology became known as the “Antifederalist— despite the fact that what they were defending (the Articles of Confederation government) was TRULY a FEDERAL system. The Antifederalists cited MANY defects in the CONstitution and warned the people — basically– that if they were stupid enough to allow this new compact to be ratified they would soon say goodbye to their liberty.
Indeed to read the warnings of the Antifederalist and to look around us today at the tyrannical tendencies of the U.S. Government, one is struck by an eerie sense of seeing prophecy come to pass. However aside from the MANY tyrannical tendencies they saw and warned of in the CONstitution, they MISSED ONE. We caught it when we were doing our research on the CONstitution, because at that time many in the Patriot movement at large were contending against Libtards and Demoncrats over the form of Government we supposedly have.
Libtards, Democrats and the majority of those in the Republican Party agree that “America is a democracy” The patriots would counter this by saying that “No, America is a republic” and as proof they would offer up Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. CONstitution wjhich states:
“The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union A REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence. ” — Article IV. Section 4 USC {emphasis added}
However the patriots seemed to forget that the right “to petition the Government for a redress of grievances” {First Amendment] DID introduce a truly democratic process. We suspected that THIS was the reason Thomas Jefferson came up with the name Democratic-Republican when he took the Antifederalist and turned them into a real political party to oppose the Federalist Party. Also at that time, the terms “republican” and “democratic” were almost interchangeable as both represented a system of government (ostensibly) by the people. However Article IV Section 4 SAYS MUCH MORE about the TRUE nature of the system of government we truly have than what had been noticed by most commentators or educators on the topic of the CONstitution. Let’s look at it again — more carefully this time:
The first thing that struck us was the LANGUAGE of the section. What stands out the most here is that TWO different entities are being discussed “The United States” and “the States” This flies in the face of the generally accepted idea that the U.S. Government is but an extension of the very States that came together to create it — nothing could be further from the truth. Look:
“The United States SHALL GUARANTEE TO every STATE in this Union a republican Form of Government, AND SHALL PROTECT EACH OF THEM..” {emphasis added}
In the context used here, “The United States” CAN ONLY MEAN the GOVERNMENT of the United States of America. Since when does the CREATION guarantee anything to the “creators”?? Indeed we were also struck by the arrogant, even imperial nature of the verbiage here. The pronouncement called to mind the vow of kings who were Lord Guarantors” and “Protectors of the realm” and “of the faith” (which in this case would be that republican form). Now let us look closer at that guarantee to PROTECTION:
“…and shall protect each of them AGAINST INVASION;” {emphasis added}
For those of you who may be wondering, President Trump is RIGHT in exercising his power to call out the National Guards (and even the U.S. Army if he deemed it necessary) to go to the border to meet the invasion coming our way from Central and South America. But there is more — take CAREFUL NOTE of this:
“… and on Application of the LEGISLATURE, OR OF THE EXECUTIVE (when the Legislature cannot be convened) AGAINST DOMESTIC VIOLENCE” {emphasis added}
There is NO QUESTION that we are talking about STATE Governments here. The mentioning of both “Legislature” and “Executive” confirms that beyond doubt, but WHAT of this SECOND potential threat that a STATE GOVERNMENT could face? What do they mean by “DOMESTIC violence”? YOU KNOW what they mean, but for all the LIBTARDS who come and read my posts I guess we will have to spell it out for them. Here are the definitions of “domestic” as provided by Merriam-Webster’s online dictionary:
Definition of domestic
1 a : living near or about human habitations domestic vermin
b : tame, domesticated the domestic cat
2 : of, relating to, or originating within a country and ESPECIALLY ONE’S OWN COUNTRY domestic politics domestic wines domestic manufacturing all debts foreign and domestic
3 : of or relating to the household or the family domestic chores domestic happiness
4 : devoted to home duties and pleasures leading a quietly domestic life
5 : indigenous a domestic species
{emphasis added}
So this reference to “domestic Violence” is none other than a reference to you, me, and everyone we know –“WE THE PEOPLE” So WHAT does this tell us about the TRUE SYSTEM OF GOVERNMENT WE HAVE LORDING OVER US??? Simple, it is a very cleverly disguised FEUDAL system. In this variant, the U.S. Government assumes the role of “Lord Guarantor and Protector of the Faith” the same role the King or Emperor assumed. The STATE Governments have been reduced to nothing more than vassal states — like so many Barons and Dukes. And “We the people” — who are supposedly the “authors” of this blasphemy to liberty? Well we TRULY are the Serfs, and we have been sorely fooled.
So THIS is WHY I HATE the U.S. Government and the U.S. CONstitution — and why YOU should too. Count me as a DIEHARD Antifederalist (or such as is opposed to the CONstitution) and moreover a COMPLETELY INVESTED AND DEVOTED SOUTHERN CONFEDERATE.
FK – Obviously the U.S. Constitution is full of loopholes the biggest one of which is they failed to clearly explain to future generations that we have a right, duty and responsibility to hunt to extinction those who seek to destroy our Bills of Rights of the Federal and various state governments be they enemies domestic or foreign.
State originally meant ‘sovereign nation state’ of course. The Founders were as imperfect as any of us and a percentage of them may have cared more about the preservation of their new empire than about human liberty, which is our problem now. The Federalist vs. anti-Federalist fight was very real at the time. One only has to read a little Hamilton in the Federalist Papers to begin uttering “Bullshit, bullshit” under one’s breath as the things he said his new govt. wouldn’t do have been dwarfed by modern reality.
Most to all of the Founders took our right to fight back as a given but now our republicrats and self-proclaimed ‘conservatives’ and ‘libertarians’ constantly feel a need to apologize to our domestic enemies for our most basic right, to kill them for trying to enslave us all.
What so many can’t or won’t see is that without our liberty it’s pointless to preserve the empire. Without an ability to fight the government or any government or human institution that seeks to rule us we are slaves. If the current global empire of note loses its tech edge in warfare how long will it be until we see foreign landing craft on our shores bringing in occupation troops from populations that far outnumber us?
In reality they arrived long ago.
I prefer to have a rifle behind each blade of grass, whether some Jap general really said it or not.
Humanity had existed for millennia under the rule of ‘god appointed kings‘ and the early presidents were referred to as ‘your excellency’ so that mindset was slow in evolving out of us. Many today would happily bow down to a king of some sort or another that promised them an easy button for all their problems.
So really we’re extremely lucky that anything good came from the American Revolution. Indeed they handed us a pearl of great price that most today take for granted or squander or simply have no understanding of what it means or is supposed to acknowledge.
It’s easier to just wait for that tax refund that they stole from their paychecks before it even reached their hands.
The bigger issue is we have a nation of pathetic cowards who think it’s better to raise children to be willing slaves than to teach them to aim small, miss small:
Can your kid hit a running commie at 300 meters then survive to re-establish Liberty here under a clean Bill of Rights that bans socialism and weapons control and ACKNOWLEDGES our natural born right to kill those who would rule us?
That is really the most important question of all.
Our real enemies:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wcmMv318_YA
FK – In reality there are no innocent lives in a representative republic. We are all responsible for maintaining and restoring our Liberty.
The trash that doesn’t like that doesn’t belong here.
FK – The fedgov gets the power to do ‘anything it wants’ by it’s willingness to do so, the whores that will do the nasty work for a paycheck and a retirement plan and the willful ignorance and apathy of the common sheeple and the superior weaponry of the modern empire of note and the cowardice of those who claim they want to be free but are incapable of shedding the blood it will be necessary to shed to fix this mess if it can be fixed.
The anti-federalists were right, just not right enough.
You are not getting both sides of this issue. Throughout the Country, those of us who are warning of the dangers of an Article V convention are marginalized, ridiculed, smeared, shut out of meetings, and barred from speaking in public forums. THIS short essay from the Principled Policy Blog describes what we face every day.
THIS article is an account by Donny Harwood, a citizen of Tennessee, describing how he was shut out of the public meeting which the Convention of States people held on October 19, 2015 at the Millennium Maxwell House Hotel in Nashville, Tennessee. According to The Leaf-Chronicle, a number of Tennessee Legislators were at the meeting. A prominent Tennessee radio talk show host was also present.
And everyone at the meeting was prevented from hearing the other side of this issue.
snip
The Left has been pushing for a convention for 50 years—ever since the Ford and Rockefeller Foundations produced the Constitution for the Newstates of America. They need a convention to get it imposed.
Several other Constitutions are already prepared and waiting for a convention.
If there is a convention, the only issues will be (1) whose Constitution will be imposed by the Delegates; and (2) what new mode of ratification will be set forth in the new Constitution.
FK – I’ll agree to a con con only with a militia force encamped outside the front door to arrest, try and execute any commies that show up to participate.
Supporters have largely dismissed the fears of a runaway convention, arguing that states could limit the scope of the convention and block any bad amendments that may emerge. However, there is ample evidence to suggest that it would be impossible to restrain a convention once it is called. The late U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice Warren Burger, for example, is among the many legal experts and scholars who have warned that a Con Con cannot be limited.
“I have repeatedly given my opinion that there is no effective way to limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention,” he said. “The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the Convention to one amendment or to one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey. After a Convention is convened, it would be too late to stop the Convention if we don’t like its agenda…. Our 1787 Constitution was referred to by several of its authors as a ‘miracle.’ Whatever gain might be hoped for from a new Constitutional Convention could not be worth the risks involved.”
While the issue may be dead in Oklahoma for this year, the battle to stop a Con Con is far from finished. Supporters of the effort are working across America to have states apply for a convention, as opponents work to stop it. Considering the well-documented risks, the American people and their elected representatives must become educated about the potential dangers. If and when the Constitution is gone, there will be no going back.
FK – How many of the delegates could pass this test?: Questions for your candidate
The fact that the amerikomies and republicrats are in favor of it and would be allowed to participate is enough reason to stop it at all costs, unless there’s a militia contingent outside the front door of the facility to immediately dispense swift justice to any who threaten the Bill of Rights, the most essential part of the Constitution that the Anti-Federalists insisted upon and is what really makes this country ‘exceptional.’ If we lose that, we lose all.
Who would be sent to this Convention? Remember, if the Article V machinery is sent into motion, think about who will control it? Our current federal government? How many times have you been frustrated with the failure of congressional leadership in both houses to uphold their oaths, or to put our interests first? Guess what? They’ll be forming and planning the convention. Uh oh. There are several pieces of state legislation in the Texas Legislature right now to specify delegates, how they are selected, their qualifications, etc. That sounds great on paper, doesn’t it? Will the delegates faithfully execute the charter given them by the various state legislatures around the country? What did the delegates to the last convention do? Here is the exhausting detail in which the convention is described.
FK – We desperately need to conduct an extensive and thorough “Liberal”(commie) trash season before any such convention is held, to make sure no foxes get into the hen house. It wouldn’t hurt to eradicate a few republicrats and other assorted authoritarians along the way as well.
They lied about the ratification of the 16th Amendment. Think it can’t happen again? If they re-write the entire document, they’ll make up the rules, new rules, as they go along anyway.
The only way I’d agree to it would be with a militia contingent outside the front door to arrest, try and execute any trash that threatened the Bill of rights or the separation of powers in any way. Our domestic blood enemies would love to saddle us with a parliament or something worse.
FK – “It was not clear how a con-con aimed at balancing the federal budget would rein in the out-of-control Supreme Court.”
Because if certain elements gain control of the convention they’ll ditch the Constitution and create their own hell on Earth and try to force us at the point of a gun to exist under it.
The only way I’d agree to such a thing is with a militia contingent outside the front door to monitor the events and arrest, try for treason and execute any trash that attempts to damage the Bill of Rights or our separation of powers.
Here’s what our domestic blood enemies, that we should be hunting and eradicating, the “Liberal”(commie) trash, would like to do:
The Constitution should be clarified so that it sustains rather than throttles democracy. Do away with the Electoral College. Ban the practice of gerrymandering. Close the loophole that allows governors to appoint cronies to vacant Senate seats. And then get serious: ask, as Congressman Victor Berger did more than a century ago, why America maintains a House of Lords–like Senate where, today, the vote of a member elected by 121,000 Wyomingites can cancel out the vote of a member elected by 7.8 million Californians. Consider electing members of the House to four-year terms that parallel those of the president, so that the popular will of 131 million voters in the presidential elections can’t be stymied by 90 million midterm voters. Object to any calculus that prevents a majority-black District of Columbia and a majority-Hispanic Puerto Rico from becoming states. Re-examine every barrier to democracy, including those of poverty, ignorance and incapacity. When Franklin Roosevelt spoke of the freedoms required to shape democratic societies, he included “freedom from want” and “freedom from fear.” Let’s restart that debate about freedom and democracy. And let’s do so not in the drab language of bureaucratic reform, but in the radical language of giving power to the people. No constitution can repair every breach in society, but a renewed US Constitution can clear the way for the people—the whole people, as opposed to a handful of elites—to forge a more perfect union.
FK – “Democracy is the road to socialism” – Karl Marx
This is hilarious, where the most commies are:
FK – Yep. So why do so many ‘conservatives’ and ‘libertarian’ types still call our domestic blood enemies “Liberals” and “progressives,” when those are only cute titles they adopted to hide their real evil? We must stop apologizing to those who would totally enslave us and treat them as the dangerous enemies they are.
And our domestic blood enemies prove him right:
FK – Thanks to these goons for proving once again our dire need for an extensive and thorough “Liberal”(commie) trash season.
Here’s the explanation from the vid page on what this was about: “Washington, DC– United States Student Association (USSA) staff members interrupted several interviews and blocked students from speaking to two Campus Reform reporters at a student-led protest Friday.”