Tag Archives: ammo

James Jaeger: MIDNIGHT RIDE – When Rogue Politicians Call for Martial Law

2 Replies

James Jaeger: Unfortunately, we were not able to get Ted Nugent or anyone connected with the NRA into this or our previous film. We tried very hard to get Ted and/or Wayne LaPierre into MIDNIGHT RIDE. I called and called and wrote and wrote, all to no avail. One of our producers, who even has a personal relationship with the Nugent family, was not even able to persuade Ted to participate. I am thus very disappointed that the NRA chose to not participate in either MOLON LABE or MIDNIGHT RIDE even though they claim that “The NRA will continue to fight for the Second Amendment” in their letters and literature.

I wrote Mr. Lapierre after MIDNIGHT RIDE was released and sent him a DVD of the movie as well as a copy of MOLON LABE. In my letter to him I stated: “Wayne, this is the film I wanted you to be in. Larry Pratt and Stewart Rhodes are both in this representing their associations’ views on guns and the Constitution. Why did you not participate on behalf of the NRA? Guns are not only for profit; they are ‘necessary’ for a ‘free state.’ Do you disagree?”

I received what seemed like a form letter back from a “David K” (no last name given) starting out: “Mr. Jaeger, Thank you for your letter to NRA Executive Vice President Wayne PaPierre. Unfortunately, Mr. LaPierre is unable to respond to your concerns personally, but he asked me to respond on his behalf . . . ”

This is almost exactly the same kind of letter I get from MPAA studio executives and supposedly “conservative Second Amendment celebrities” like Clint Eastwood, Ted Nugent, Gary Sinise or their agents. All of these people, and others, whom I have contacted seem to be cowed by political correctness and the agenda of Hollywood as dictated by the 21 men that govern the MPAA studio-distributors and New York-based Mainstream Media. Otherwise, why doesn’t Wayne LaPierre go on network TV and state something like: The NRA supports the Second Amendment and believes there are five reasons to keep and bear: 1) target shooting; 2) hunting; 3) self-defense; 4) deterrent against tyranny and 5) one’s role to participate in their state militia per the U.S. Constitution?

Answer: Because if he did this – or Ted or Clint or Gary did this – they would be roasted as much as Donald Trump is currently being roasted by the Establishment and the gun-control lobby’s propagandizing networks. Any non-multibillionaire who tries to buck the Establishment or the Globalist Agenda will be met with intense heat, total blackout or who knows what.

FK – When I first got involved in the patriot movement, wouldn’t have called it that at the time, that early in my waking up, I went to a SAF training session in Gatlinburg, TN where Tanya Metaksa was a guest speaker. She explained the NRA’s lobbying process thusly: We give money to the candidates we hope win but if they lose we offer money to their winning opponent. This ended my desire to be part of the NRA. I had only been a member once for a year anyway, a few years before. This was in 1994 when the first ‘assault weapons ban’ was passed.

I’ve asked the NRA why they fear the ‘m’ word so much and didn’t get much of an answer.

I attended their annual convention when it was held in Louisville, KY a few years back and saw lots of Safari guides and multi-thousand dollar shotguns. Not that I’m against those things but it told me a lot, or rather confirmed my suspicions that despite their claims of being made up of lots of $20 members at the top it’s a rich boy’s club.

The ‘No Rights that aren’t Allowed’ group does some good things and if I were wealthy enough to become a life member and actually have a say I might do so but if I had the extra money I’d send it to GOA or some other group that has proven their mettle.

As for re-establishing the militia I don’t pretend to have the legal/research background of Dr. Vieira but I think it’ll be a snowy day in hell when all the states do such in a way we would find appropriate. When the order to ‘turn them in’ is given and a commie SCOTUS rules in favor of such as they will and the metal begins to meet the meat the militia will be made up of whomever has the backbone to show up and there’ll be nothing ‘official’ about it until we win and hold the treason/war-crimes trials.

Don’t miss the rest of that article.

Here’s the doc.:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EYTQK657ztk

FK – Since I haven’t had time to watch it yet I’ll reserve comment. Their earlier film Molon Labe is posted on my must read/watch page.

Their premiere page.

The problem:

FK – Sounds like a fundraiser with no meat. Where’s the beef Wayne? Why are you so afraid of the ‘m’ word?

This is what our domestic blood enemies wish for us all:

UK Firearms Attack Video: Run, Hide, Pray You Don’t Get Killed

FK – Pathetic Brits. But then we have many just as useless over here. The Brits lost all their Liberty when they failed to open “Liberal”(commie) trash season when they were told to surrender their weapons. That will not be tolerated here.

This is what makes us exceptional:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_av5LD65WP8

FK – The Bill of Rights is what makes us exceptional.

Celebrate Bill of Rights Day, Dec 15th

You’ll be Freer and Richer in the Bill of Rights Culture

Revolution is in the Air; It’s Time America

Gun Laws We Follow and Gun Laws We Ignore

What are “Crisis Actors?” | Stuff They Don’t Want You to Know

Leave a reply

FK – I think the ‘no one died at Sandy Hook’ crowd are involved in some kind of disinfo op, probably to discredit real ‘conspiracy theorists’ and the ‘right wing’ et al.

I can’t buy an entire town would be complicit in covering up faking the deaths of 20 kids. I can buy govt. or NGO agents being involved in killing 20 kids, no problem. They’ve proven over and over again they don’t care who or what they kill.

Don’t let our real enemies change our focus.

Will Speaker Ryan Heed Pelosi’s Call for More Gun Control?

1 Reply

Within the next few days, Congress will consummate a deal on the massive “omnibus” appropriations bill to fund all discretionary functions of the government.

House Speaker Paul Ryan is widely reported to be crafting a deal which would pass the bill with Democratic votes — in lieu of conservative pro-gun Republicans.

In particular, Pelosi is demanding that Congress remove “boilerplate” text which has existed for twenty years — language that prevents the use of taxpayer dollars for “junk science” government studies in support of gun control.

According to The Hill this weekend, while many Republicans are balking at Pelosi’s request, some have indicated that they are willing to engage in some horse-trading on this issue, and “House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) has declined to take a position” at all.

We saw on Sunday how newspapers like the New York Times use fraudulent “studies” from anti-gun nuts like the “Violence Policy Center” — and then pretend how these Leftist kooks are “unbiased.”

Imagine how much worse this would be if liberal Obama-controlled government agencies began pushing these same corrupt anti-gun “analyses.”

Remember, there’s a reason that Congress de-funded this research in the first place.

ACTION:  Please click here to urge your Representatives to vote against any version of the “omnibus” spending bill that would allow fraudulent anti-gun “junk science” studies by Obama’s government agencies.

FK – Looks like bonehead was replaced by a peckerhead with kneepads.

We might be needing this:

FK – I was told about the govt. dumping jeeps and other things in the ocean after WWII partly because they auto makers didn’t want the competition.

GunTV Offers Live Shopping for Weapons

GunTv

Chart of the day: More guns, less gun violence between 1993 and 2013

FK – A couple of our congress critters are worth their salaries. Here’s one:

FK – Don’t give them any ideas…

At least he’s attacking our real enemies and not talking about building a North Amerikan iron curtain.

Arm yourself to protect against mass shootings, some sheriffs telling public

Leave a reply

With a backdrop of terrorism in California, mass shootings on college campuses and jihad in Paris, a handful of Florida sheriffs are urging citizens to arm themselves to be the first line of defense in such attacks.

That has outraged gun control advocates, who say the public is in more – not less – danger when there are more guns are on the street.

The debate between gun advocates and gun control supporters got new traction in recent days with some sheriffs suggesting more citizens should carry guns to protect themselves and others in case of terrorist attacks or mass shootings.

“The only thing that stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun,” said Brevard County Sheriff Wayne Ivey in a video posting on his agency’s Facebook page.

“Like each of you, I’ve had enough of terrorists and others who decide they want to target U.S. citizens because they want to make a statement or get their 15 minutes of fame,” he said. “Now, more than ever before, is the time for law enforcement and citizens to be fully prepared for an attack or an active shooter scenario with the right tools to eliminate or at least disrupt the attack.”

He urged those who are licensed to carry concealed firearms to have their guns with them at all times.

“You are the first line of defense,” he said, “for you, your family and others around you.”

FK – A right applied for is a privilege.

Good for these sheriffs, for the smidgen of bravery they are showing. But we must have much more. Our domestic blood enemies who seek to disarm and fully enslave us all are far more dangerous than a handful of fundie ragheads hiding in a cave or sneaking across an open border. We must deal with them or continue to watch our country and our Liberty die.

All real American patriots who are capable should be part of the ‘first line of defense’ against our greatest enemies, our blood domestic enemies, as part of their local militia. Every squad should have one of these:

FK – If we had a free country every militia unit would have one of these per squad, or fire team. If we had a nation of men we’d make it so.

Otherwise don’t cache it on your own property. That’s the first place the BATF Nazi trash will look.

GOA: Calls for National Gun Confiscation

Leave a reply

The Anti-gun Left Declares War on Your Gun Rights

President Obama took to the airwaves on Sunday night and told the nation we need more gun control.

Hillary Clinton — the one who will most likely be the Democrat nominee for president in 2016 — recently called for an all-out war on guns, as well.

And then, for the first time since 1920, the New York Times published an editorial on the front page of their newspaper.

This is important because the editorial page of the Times reflects the thinking of the anti-gun Democrat Left.

And what is the theme of the Times‘ most important message in nearly a hundred years?

In two words:  Gun Confiscation.

FK – So what’re you gonna do when they come for yours? They’ll happily take it out of your cold dead hands. Are you going to sit home and wait your turn or meekly ‘turn them in’ and bequeath to your descendants a legacy of pathetic slovenly slavery?

Why aren’t you training with the militia now for the inevitable?

Pelosi: California Gun Laws Didn’t Stop Terrorists, So ‘That’s Why We Need a National Gun Law’

Jerry Brown calls other states’ gun laws ‘gigantic back door’ for terrorists

Democrats more motivated to go after NRA than ISIS

FK – Because they know who their real enemies are: those of us who will begin to kill them when enough finally realize the necessity of doing so.

Supreme Court denies assault weapons ban challenge

Why are gun rights activists planning a fake mass shooting?

Which States Allow Concealed Carry? This Map Shows Who Can Legally Carry a Gun and Where

FK – If the governments were ‘by the people’ they would need our permission to carry guns but this has become a nation of cowardly pacified whores. Simple sad fact.

This one is really important:

Why Congress stopped gun control activism at the CDC

Kurt Russell: ‘Absolutely Insane’ to Think Gun Control Will Change Terrorists

FK – Well a few of the Hollyweird types have a clue.

Another really important one:

The facts that neither side wants to admit about gun control

FK – Our domestic blood enemies have no problem with violence when it suits their purposes and many of them have no problem with blood on their own hands:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y6KZFckCluc

FK – Who or what is more powerful, a tiny handful that manages to kill a few mush heads now and again, often with government help, or those that can disarm and thus fully enslave hundreds of millions?

Needed: Domestic Disarmament, Not ‘Gun Control’

Leave a reply

Advocates of gun control frequently cite the much lower levels of gun violence in other developed nations — such as Canada and the UK — in support of the measures they promote. However, these very low levels of gun violence have not been achieved by gun control but — by domestic disarmament.

Most people have no guns in these fully democratic nations and have no way of getting them, legally or otherwise. It is hence at best naïve, sometimes disingenuous, to imply that if several gun control measure would be enacted — and somehow enforced — the U.S. would gain what these other nations take for granted. (By the way, Black Lives Matters may wish to take note: In these blessed nations most cops, most of the time, have no guns either.)

Given that even micro gun control measures will be effectively blocked by the NRA and its allies, and that promoting mini measures as potentially effective is misleading, progressives may as well go for the big enchilada: Call for domestic disarmament.

FK – WE WON’T COMPLY!

What’s an ‘illegal gun?’ Those two words are nowhere to be found in the Second Amendment.

Was the Inland Center a ‘gun free zone?” Why is commiefornia still a ‘may issue’ state?

If the Marxist mutt and other commie extremists that call themselves ‘liberal’ and ‘progressive’ tell us to surrender our weapons and thus our most basic right, they’ll find out what blood really is.

The most important ‘private property’ anyone owns is their own life, health, safety, and no one, anywhere, anytime has the ‘right’ to take that from them or deny them their most basic right, that of self defense.

We all get the elected public servants the brain dead sheeple deserve.

I’ll vote for the candidate that will bring the troops home, activate the militias, and re-invade and re-conquer commiefornia and the other commie enclaves on the left and East coasts.

They’re not ‘leftists,’ ‘liberal’ or ‘progressive.’ They’re communists/globalists. They want us disarmed so we can’t kill them when enough finally wake up to the necessity of doing so.

Our Liberty is dying because of our failure to hunt the “Liberal”(commie) and globalist trash to extinction.

What must be done – A manifesto of the ‘isms.’

Don’t understand my bad attitude? Start here.

Governments will always be able to get guns so we must always be better armed than them.
Act politically but prep for what history shows will have to be done. It’s way past time to prep for what will be required.

Un-controllable automatic weapons?

Leave a reply

FK – The issue is those who consider us to be livestock can’t control them when they’re in our hands.

But then, the average dumbass barely knows Liberty exists at all:

FK – The alternative reaction could have been a SWAT team responding to a ‘terrorist’ in a mask.

Now on to dealing with a different kind of zombie:

FK – A right applied for is a privilege.

This is all about privileges. Do we have a ‘free country?’ Of course not.

We must take our country back, repeal all this garbage and get control of how the ‘police’ are indoctrinated. If they don’t know their first responsibility is the protection of the Bill of Rights and the expansion of human Liberty then they have no business with a badge or any authority over anyone.

Gun Owners of America Challenging Federal Machine Gun Ban

Leave a reply

On November 2, Gun Owners of America (and its foundation) joined forces with Dick Heller — the very one who beat DC’s gun ban before the Supreme Court in 2008.

Working in tandem, Gun Owners filed a brief in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit in support of a challenge to the federal machine gun ban, which was stuck on at the last minute to an otherwise pro-gun bill in 1986.

First and foremost, Gun Owners argues that the “arms” protected by the Second Amendment include fully automatic weapons, and that Supreme Court opinions have bolstered this view.

Our brief explains that the Second Amendment is not about hunting or target shooting, but about the preservation of liberty.

Go here to read GOA’s brief in Hollis v. Lynch.

Go here to help financially support the GOA brief in this case.

Since its founding, Gun Owners of America has built its reputation as the “no compromise” gun lobby.

We want to repeal any restriction that violates the “shall not be infringed” language of the Second Amendment — going all the way back to 1934.

FK – And don’t forget about the ‘Sullivan Act‘ in new yawk city and similar evils. And don’t miss reading the wonderful history of the trash that supports such evil. Typical.

Fox News Throws The NRA Under The Bus!

Leave a reply

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH9eZpw-9ig

FK – The ‘No Rights that aren’t Allowed’ group needs to be thrown under the bus for not openly demanding a repeal of all ‘gun laws,’ treason trials for those who write, vote for and enforce gun law, and their cowardice that keeps them from openly supporting, training and organizing the militias for what will be required.

What a pathetic nation of cowards.