If that’s true, the scarcity of comments, on the “pro-deal” pieces, bringing gun owners information they have not heard before, leads to the disturbing conclusion that the pro-gun community just doesn’t care that much about what happens to JPFO one way or the other, leading back to an observation I made in my first Gun Rights Examiner piece: “The inescapable conclusion is, had gun owners stepped up and supported a group struggling after the passing of its founder, its rescue would have been unneeded.”

“Wow. Way to blame others for the group’s failure,” one critic of that observation responded in comments. “I might suggest that a lack of support stems from a perception that JPFO isn’t getting much done.”

I might suggest that perception stems from someone who does not recognize the value of the unique lessons JPFO alone provides, and that if his opinion had merit, a shrewd businessman like Alan Gottlieb would have no interest in assuming the costs of turning the group’s fortunes around. I might suggest a person who makes a comment like that has spent very little time seeing what it is JPFO does have to offer, and on helping to support its mission.

I might also suggest that a comment posted on a message board in response to Wolfe’s initial piece reflects an even more troubling issue.

“I skimmed through the article and still have no idea what SAF and JPFO means,” the forum member wrote.

FK – I often meet ‘gun owners’ who’ve never heard of GOA much less SAF, JPFO or any of the numerous smaller state orgs. out there. The average sheeple only allocates a tiny percentage of it’s brain power to really thinking about politics in any way. Our enemies know this. BTW, I don’t doubt our enemies long ago infiltrated the ‘No Rights that aren’t Allowed’ group if they didn’t found it to begin with. At best it’s a rich boys club despite their claims of members supporting it 20 bucks as a time or whatever. Most of its members obviously don’t understand the dire situation we are in or what will be required. It’s not that I haven’t been trying. But telling some people the truth is like saying the emperor has no clothes, when acknowledging such might endanger someone’s mortgage, bass boat, 50″ flat screen or NASCAR tickets.

So what happens when the government is not restrained by law? What happens first is that the government does what it wants, as it wants, without accountability. That provides those left unprotected by the law two ugly choices. On one hand, they can submit, and allow themselves to be oppressed, existing at the pleasure, and subject to the whims, of their masters.

The alternative is to fight. Look at the Declaration of Independence. It’s largely a chronicle of English lawlessness, though the members of this administration no doubt consider that document unworthy of study because the Founding Fathers were cisgender, phallocentric racists or something.

Chairman Mao, who is a big favorite of the half-wits in the White House, said it best: “Power comes from the barrel of a gun.” If there is no law, there is no moral reason not to pick up a rifle and take what you want. The moral imperative of the law is that you will obey and respect it even if you disagree with it because it was justly imposed and will be fairly enforced. But if the law is neither justly imposed nor fairly enforced, that moral obligation disappears.

FK – Gee, what’s taking so many so long to wake up to reality? I realized what would be required many years ago.

FK – Combat isn’t sunday school. Finally they get some air support. Where were their grenade launchers? Some explanation was posted under the vid:

This patrol was a relief in place and I was on point leading the new guys in for the RIP. We hadn’t taken much contact in this area, and it was generally considered a “safe” zone in Logar Province.

We patrolled the area frequently, and the locals would regularly thank us for pushing the Taliban away from their village so they could live their daily lives without constant threat.

The Taliban that we came across during this patrol were actually setting up to shoot down our new surveillance balloon that was launched in the area. The balloon caught the entire fight on camera from above, which confirmed that we killed 3 Taliban fighters during this engagement.

I saw the first guy shoulder his RPG, take a knee, and point it directly at me from about 15 meters away. I’m not sure if it was luck, but I shot first and hit him twice. The rest of the team engaged immediately after.

At the end of the day there were no friendly casualties, and we had eliminated 3 Taliban fighters.

I wanted to share the video with the world because I was sick of hearing all the ignorant things said about what we are doing over there. People need to understand what it’s like on the ground for the troops on the front line, and see what we have to deal with on a daily basis without some political spin on the story.

This footage has been edited to exclude the close up graphic footage of the enemy KIA.

The act would limit the powers of provincial chief firearms officers, make all firearm licences possession-and-acquisition (PAL) licences, make it easier for legal gun owners to transport restricted firearms around their home province, provide a grace period to renew expired gun licenses, make the gun safety course mandatory for new shooters, and crack down further on domestic abusers owning guns.

“These measures would streamline licensing and eliminate needless red tape for law-abiding gun owners,” Blaney said. “Those who have shown a pattern of violent behaviour should not be able to possess firearms. These are the people we should focus our gun control efforts on.”

In 2012, the Tories scrapped the controversial long gun registry.

FK – It’s a right not a privilege.

If the sheeple had any ‘common sense’ they’d have long ago built the militia force necessary to hunt and eradicate the “Liberal”(commie) trash who want to disarm us all so we can’t kill them.

That’s what it’s about. That’s all it’s about.