https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cdh-W-Eql9E

FK – Unfortunately most are in the ‘don’t give a damn and never will stage.’ Then we have the “Oh, this contradicts my lifelong efforts to sit on my ass and wait for the world to end so it doesn’t matter,” stage.

Lie to them about what you are and take their money anyway and buy more ammo.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rLmr9P98-Do

FK – Ham fisted? Are they assuming creatures in such positions have something that resembles a conscience?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONVZdoSM0zI

FK – Blind faith got us into this mess. It won’t get us out.

Particularly disturbing is that the new manual targets internet users and conspiracy theorists. If someone is judged, by some vague set of criteria, to spend too much time on the internet, they could be judged to be mentally ill and ineligible to own a gun. How are you receiving this information? The chances are that you are, at least according to Obama and Biden, giving in to your internet addiction and reading this article. Under the new Obama guidelines this would be grounds for gun confiscation. The alternative media is predicated on internet readership and listenership. These groups would be among the first groups to oppose a martial law crackdown, and now they are the first to be targeted.

snip

Under Obama’s new proposed gun regulations, anyone who has a diagnosable, or is potentially diagnosable (i.e. pre-crime) for being mentally ill, can have their gun confiscated. Vice President Biden even feels that they can violate HIPPA privacy regulations in requiring the states to report who has been treated for a mental illness. Therefore, in the name of confiscating your gun, this administration thinks it is acceptable to violate federal privacy laws.

snip

The new DSM (5) has expanded the definition of ODD to include adults who exemplify “paranoid ideation” about the government and frequently express these delusional ideations on the internet.

FK – How long until refusing an annual mental check under commie care results in a loss of ‘privileges.’ Are you ready for what will be required?

FK – What so many ‘libertarians’ seem to miss or ignore is that all those policies were intentionally implemented to produce the outcomes that have resulted.

Yes, it is true: Oath Keepers received a bizarre bit of leaked info which could not be verified but which also could not be ignored. Our contact is connected with the Department of Defense – or “was”. The info we received stated that Eric Holder of the Department of Justice had okayed a drone strike on the Bundy ranch near Bunkerville, Nevada, within a 48 hour period over the weekend of April 26/27, 2014.

That, fortunately, turned out to be “dis-info” – a false rumor. And though it came from a trusted source, Oath Keepers could neither prove nor disprove it. Oath Keepers is thankful that the rumor was false and no one got hurt. Oath Keepers also is aware that the source of that rumor requires debriefing, which would hopefully lead to the author of that operation. It was a directed attack on Oath Keepers to do several things including gaging our comms depth, our speed in Intel, and study how we responded. The project’s cheerleaders were already implanted in the militias operating on-site at the ranch, so that when Oath Keepers responded to the rumor new forces would be ready to pounce on Oath Keepers.

FK – This is war. There are always spies, counter spies, propaganda and counter propaganda. But personally, I wouldn’t put it past them, if they thought they could get away with it. None of the trash has stood trial for murdering the Branch Davidians and railroading some of the survivors into prison.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U5X2-YfP_Og

…and how many are incapable of understanding what the following actually means?:

All Oath Keepers know that President Obama signed into “law” the infamous NDAA-2012, which placed American citizens under military jurisdiction. Under the NDAA-2012 any American citizen may be picked up by the military and placed in custody under a military tribunal – without even being charged with a crime – and – without benefit of a lawyer – and – may be held indefinitely until the so-called “war on terror” is finally over, which some politicians have said could last a hundred years or more. We also know that the USA PATRIOT ACT of 2001 greatly released restrictions on government enforcement agents and permitted them to violate American citizens’ unalienable rights. We all know that the NSA is collecting all of our communications. We know that dissent against current policy in government is being targeted by government agencies including the IRS and DHS.

The new rules will require popular bloggers to register by name with Russia’s communications oversight agency and conform to regulations on the mass media.

The Kremlin denies allegations of censorship or pressure on the media and says Russians have the right to express their opinions and stage protests.

CIA PROJECT

But Putin has described the Internet as a CIA project and parliament has approved moves requiring social media websites to keep their servers in Russia and save information about users for at least six months.

With 61 million users, Russia is Europe’s fastest-growing Internet audience, according to a 2013 report by industry body comScore, and blogs have been seen by Putin’s opponents as one of the few popular platforms beyond the Kremlin’s reach.

FK – See below. Are  you ready for what will be required?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-3bikAppoi0

FK – Until humanity stops choosing from among all the versions of authoritarianism nothing will improve.

…and the brain dead chick with glasses doesn’t ‘agree’ with him but she’ll happily send her black-suited Nazis to force her Marxist ideology down your throat.

The White House’s “National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace” would replace the current system of using passwords to access sensitive online accounts with something akin to a biometric ID card that would link one individual to all their government services, such as food stamps, welfare as well as a myriad of other things like mortgage applications and applications for licenses.

“The original proposal was quick to point out that this isn’t a federally mandated national ID. But if successful, it could pave the way for an interoperable authentication protocol that works for any website, from your Facebook account to your health insurance company,” writes Meghan Neal, warning that the proposal is “a scary can of worms to open”.

FK – That would be the same as killing the First Amendment. Are you ready for what will be required?

FK – So the important question is how do we counter it?