https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9ozaAqmLTFY

FK – Here is the resolution she refers to. We already have de facto registration via GCA ’68. Filling out a form to exercise a right makes it a privilege.

Sheriffs’ resolution takes on beltway bandits

From the start, the latest UNCTAD report makes the theme clear — global, centralized Big Government under any pretext is the goal. “UNCTAD’s 50th anniversary falls at a time when, once again, there are calls for changes in the way the global economy is ordered and managed,” said the UN outfit, founded in 1964 amid demands from Third World regimes and autocrats (called “developing countries”) for more wealth redistribution from Western taxpayers. “Back in 1964, the international community [sic] recognized that ‘If privilege, extremes of wealth and poverty, and social injustice persist, then the goal of development is lost’.”

The controversial UN bureaucracy, perhaps most infamous for its decades-old push to build what it calls a “New International Economic Order,” goes on to blast so-called “market liberalism,” more commonly known in the United States as free markets. “Almost everywhere in recent years, the spread of market liberalism has coincided with highly unequal patterns of income and wealth distribution,” the report continues, claiming that governments and international outfits cannot keep ceding more “space” to market forces. “As the international community frames an ambitious development agenda beyond 2015, the moment is right to propose another international ‘New Deal’ that can realize the promise of ‘prosperity for all’.”

FK – The UN can’t do much without the military might of the beast system we exist under.

FK – I like how he says ‘hurx.’ We are born into a world of mysteries and will likely die in such. Some of these I’d never heard of before. They claim they now know who Jack the Ripper was.

One more just for fun:

FK – I’d never break into the current Brit queen’s bedroom for fear she might ask me to stay.

You have heard of the “No Fly List”, right?  Well, now the Tories are pledging that if they win the next election in the UK they will establish a list of “extremists” that will have to have their social media posts “approved in advance by the police” before they post them.  There are also plans to ban “extremists” from broadcasting and speaking at public events.  The stated goal of these proposals is to crack down on terrorism, but in the process the civil liberties of the British people are going to be flushed down the toilet.  And the American people need to pay close attention to what is going on in the UK, because whatever police state measures are implemented over there usually also get implemented over here eventually.  For those that believe that we need to do “whatever it takes” to fight terrorism, there is a very important question that you need to ask yourself.  What if the government decides that you are an “extremist” because of what you believe?  What will you do then?

When I saw a report in the Telegraph today entitled “Extremists to have Facebook and Twitter vetted by anti-terror police“, I could hardly believe it.

Do the British people actually want a “no social media list” that will essentially ban people from using Facebook and Twitter even though they haven’t actually been convicted of doing anything wrong?

FK – The corporations that run the net want us all to be easily identifiable so they can control our speech and actions by threatening our ability to ‘make a living.’ Our real enemies are those who wage war against Human Liberty for whatever reason or excuse, whether their banner is religious, commie or a government flag.

Our nation has tolerated ‘extremists’ for decades that should have long ago been kicked out:

FK – Unfortunately human nature dictates these discussions amount to the pot calling the kettle black. Ayers is right about some of the problems he points out though his solutions are evil and the Faux Newshore is as wrong in her blind patriotism. Who can say for sure what the servants of the beast really desire. Every Nazi claims he’s defending the country, or democracy or truth, freedom and the amerikan way or some such.

FK – Sounds like she borrowed from this:

FK – I still kinda prefer my more adult version.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EtMWTYBdmaE

Oregon man openly carrying new gun robbed by man with gun

FK – The reason for ‘open carry’ is to prove a point to the “Liberal”(commie) trash and to do things they don’t want us to be able to do because they are evil. It’s not a ‘safe’ world. No where is ‘safe.’ There are less dangerous places but none are safe.

I used to open carry often back in the mid-90s. Of course here in Kentucky it was never an issue, except to the ignorant and the evil. On occasion I still do. If someone pulls a gun on you, it’s decision time. I can’t tell you what your decision should be. As ‘ol Dirty Harry used to say “A man’s gotta know his limitations.” But that doesn’t mean you surrender your dignity or take a chance on coming under the control or power of an evil individual.

Always be aware of your surroundings and don’t let anyone get too close to you and when it’s unavoidable cover your weapon with your hand or arm or something just don’t do it in a threatening manner. The “Liberal”(commie) trash will do all it can to get you in trouble or make our Liberty look bad to the sheeple.

The unfortunate fact is that there will be more of these events. Don’t allow the “Liberal”(commie) trash to make an issue of it or use it an excuse to attack our most basic right and get ready to do them what will be required.

There are many things to consider:

FK – Doesn’t do any good to own all that ammo if ya’ can’t hump it.

Anyone notice his safety is ‘off?’

FK – Click on the pic, the gif doesn’t work here for some reason…

To put it more bluntly, since Mr. Heien was violating no law when he was stopped, the state objectively has no property interest in his person or in his car or anything that could potentially be found in his car (like a gun). For that reason alone, the stop violated the Fourth Amendment, regardless of how “reasonable” some North Carolina judges subjectively believed the police had acted.

Protecting the Fourth Amendment is important because it ultimately protects gun owners from being illegally stopped, searched and having their firearms seized.

You can help support cases like this by giving generously to the work that GOA does.

Not only will that help us to challenge anti-gun laws in the courts, you will be helping GOA to magnify its no-compromise message on Capitol Hill.

FK – To put it more bluntly we must gain control of how these junior Nazis are educated so they don’t do evil things like this, including enforcing evil laws and not having the courage to arrest, prosecute and execute those who write them.

Mark Kelly: Gun Control Is ‘Never Going to Stop’ All Gun Violence

Stalking victim exercises Second Amendment rights on tormentor

Poll: 84 Percent of Americans Believe Violence Committed With Guns a Criminal Issue, Not Public Health Issue

CDC Gun Violence Study’s Findings Not What Obama Wanted

Gardner Winning Big with Colorado Gun Owners

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gRhHUeGJ9fU

FK – They taste good but I don’t know how reliable they are meteorlogically.